Re: problem compiling on Mac OS X

That's interesting..  however, I won't change to OS X / Gentoo just for=20=

that. :)

ebuilds, fink, and debian are the targets I have in mind.  Not in this=20=

order.


20.4.2005 kello 02:13, Adri=E1n P=E9rez kirjoitti:


> El 19/04/2005, a las 23:14, Asko Kauppi escribi=F3:
>
>> =46rom the experience I have, fink is simpler than -say- Debian=20
>> packaging, and very developer friendly, actually. Also, I'd regard it=20=

>> as #1 solution for making Lua easy to use (sorry - install :) on OS=20=

>> X.
>
> Well, this is what Portage says:
>
>    moebius@gila moebius $ emerge lua -p
>
>    These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
>    Calculating dependencies ...done!
>    [ebuild  N    ] dev-lang/lua-5.0.2
>
> ...and yes, I'm using Portage (the Gentoo build/package facility)=20
> under MacOS X, and it's being a valuable tool for installing software=20=

> -- even better than Fink IMHO. And I find making ebuilds somewhat=20
> easier than Fink .info files. Maybe a luacheia ebuild could be=20
> interesting?
>
> --
> Adrian Perez
> GPUL/CLUG member =BB http://gpul.org
> Keyboard Error: F1 is patented!



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728