Re: autubuild failures in lxp

Ahhhh, okay!
now I'm sure there's a way to 'test' this packaging & building locally?
And also I guess that explains the missing header in luaCOM in the 
tarball...

Ok, I'll be adding those files for lxp soon.

thanks, Martin

>Yup, you should add the necessary header files to the
>lualxp_la_SOURCES line in src/modules/lxp/Makefile.am.  Even though
>the headers are not compiled directly, automake wants to know about
>them so it can put them in the tarball.  It's smart enough to treat .h
>differently than .c.
>
>FYI, if you have some source files that must not be compiled directly,
>but must be included in the distribution, you can add a
>"EXTRA_targetname_SOURCES" line.  For example,
>src/modules/bit/Makefile.am does this with lbitlib.c, because
>lbitlib.c is included directly into lbitlib_wrapper.c.
>
>  
>




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click