Re: Moto binary
David Hakim <dhakim-Gkm/TONP9n1Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:17:17 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.moto.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think I need to do some more testing. My Redhat 7.3 box is kind of ... 'not totally operational' right now so I can't test the module or mmc at the moment. The more reported success stories I hear from user who have installed RPMs built by other users the more confident I'll feel. To this end I suggest that perhaps RPMs should start getting added to the contrib directory in the repository so they can be tested by other users (who have access to the repository). I can also see about adding a contrib area to the moto support site (with file upload) where these RPMs can be uploaded and retrieved by a larger group. What RPMs do we need exactly ? I figure new RPMs will be needed when new moto versions come out. Is there any way we can automate construction of these RPMs for multiple targets at once :) And I guess we would like a different package for each of the major linux distros (rh,debian,suse,mandrake) How do the linux versions play into RPM construction ? Do we need a different rpm for Redhat 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, and 8.0 ? Should we only ever bother with the last two or three releases ? Your spec file uses the Redhat layout. I haven't used that layout on my own installations in ages :) but it seems to work. I worry a little that the RH layout isn't really up to modern RH standards ... could someone take a look at the layout and see if it makes sense ? Should we also distribute RPMs that use the unified layout ? Sorry for all these questions. Package management is just a very foreign concept to me that I need to learn more about :) -Dave BTW: Great work Stefano! On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 04:53 PM, Stefano Corsi wrote: > Alle 20:50, mercoledì 19 marzo 2003, hai scritto: >> Could you commit both the new spec file and the crypto patch to the >> contrib directory ? > > Sure. What do you think? Are you planning to add a link for the binary > dist to > the download page? In such a case we could add both the binary .rpm > file > compiled for RH 7.3 and RH 8.0 plus the src.rpm if the user wants to > produce > the .rpm by himself. > > Stefano >