Re: .NET CLR?

> given Nice's claim that it is not here to replace
> Java..
> 
> all these talk of the wretched JVM is giving me a
> headache. I don't see myself getting involved in Nice
> anyway, but still, why not .NET CLR?
> 
> they are going to support generics, I mean, their VM
> is going to support generics. they are not that much
> class centric... functions are not necessarily
> methods, I guess. I am not very keen on the fine
> difference between Java generics, ML sub-typing, and
> CLR generics, so forgive me if I am dreaming.

Isn't Nice generics recorded in "package.nicei"?
It seems that Nice mitigates the problem of not having generics in the 
bytecode. In fact, i use this every day: i have "NiceTee" templates 
compiled separately from the main application, and all Nice generics are 
still visible and used.


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click