Re: Expression-local variables and 'let'

> using(val in = ...) {
>   ...
> }
> is more readable than
> {
>   let in = ...;
>   using (in) {
>     ..
>   }
> }

Maybe 
   using(in = ...){} 
is more readable still, like
   for (i: 1..10){}


> class Bar { ...}
> <Bar Alike> Alike foo(int x, Alike bar) { ... }
> 
> The thing is that for methods declared inside a class, there is no
> way to constrain the type of this, so 'alike' was needed.

So that in that example there's nothing special about 'Alike' - it's
just a type parameter?
   <Bar B> B foo(int x, B bar) { ... }

So 'alike' is a fix for the "within a class" syntax sugar?





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click