RE: named pipes or files on disk?
"Brian Raven" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.active-perl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: Jer A [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 21 April 2010 22:47 To: Brian Raven; [email protected] Subject: RE: named pipes or files on disk? > will accessing a html file, that is in the memory of a daemon, load as fast/faster > when accessed by the cgi script, through sockets?, than if the file was on disk? It depends, but probably. Sockets are a common way of communicating with daemons. However, you haven't mentioned why you think you need to speed up access to this file. -- Brian Raven Please consider the environment before printing this email. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. _______________________________________________ ActivePerl mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs