RE: named pipes or files on disk?
Jer A <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.active-perl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It is for cache purposes. I don't want to be writing hundreds of compiled pages to disk, and I need a solution that does not depend on a database...so that is why I've chosen to write a daemon. Jeremy > Subject: RE: named pipes or files on disk? > Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:22:32 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > > From: Jer A [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 21 April 2010 22:47 > To: Brian Raven; [email protected] > Subject: RE: named pipes or files on disk? > > > will accessing a html file, that is in the memory of a daemon, load as > fast/faster > > when accessed by the cgi script, through sockets?, than if the file > was on disk? > > It depends, but probably. Sockets are a common way of communicating with > daemons. However, you haven't mentioned why you think you need to speed > up access to this file. > > -- > Brian Raven > > Please consider the environment before printing this email. > > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. > > Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. > _________________________________________________________________ Live connected. Get Hotmail & Messenger on your phone. http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9724462 _______________________________________________ ActivePerl mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs