RE: named pipes or files on disk?
"Brian Raven" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.active-perl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: Jer A [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 23 April 2010 04:55 To: Brian Raven; [email protected] Subject: RE: named pipes or files on disk? > It is for cache purposes. I don't want to be writing hundreds of compiled pages to disk, and I need a > solution that does not depend on a database...so that is why I've chosen to write a daemon. That doesn't really answer my question (i.e. what advantage do you expect a daemon to give you over the simply reading files from disk?), but it does add a couple of additional snippets, namely "hundreds of compiled pages" and "not depend on a database". -- Brian Raven Please consider the environment before printing this email. This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. _______________________________________________ ActivePerl mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs