Re: [code-review] Please review String::FlexMatch

On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:58:39AM +0200, Marcel Gr?nauer wrote:
> I completely agree. Do you think the extra line
> in Test::More::_deep_check(), namely
>   defined(overload::Method($_, '""')) && $_ = "$_" for $e1, $e2;
> as discussed in a previous mail would enforce this behaviour? If so,
> I could write a patch and tests against 5.8.1-RC4 and propose them to
> p5p.

Sounds like the wrong place to put it to me ... how does is() cope with
two overloaded references? is_deeply should do it the same way (ideally
by just calling is ...)

Tony