Re: qw(l i s t) vs (l, i, s, t)
Stefan Stiasny <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.fun |
|---|---|
| Organization | Legion of Dynamic Discord |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hi > Could someone please explain what is happening here? > I came across it, and had a hard time trying to figure out what was > going on. in 5.6.1 it seems to work the correct way, i.e. the first two examples aren't true, while the third and fourth evaluate as true. maybe something was changed in the behaviour of qw, it seems that it in scalar context, it behaves like an array, not like a constant list with the comma operator ... anyway, it sounds more like a bug report thant fwp sc -- stefan stiasny <[email protected]> In an evolving universe, who stands still moves backwards.