Re: MethodMaker

Greetings Markus,

On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 01:38:21PM +0200, Markus Werner wrote:
> Your Module is just the right thing I was looking for. 
> Thank you.
> 
> Just a little think ...
> 
> 
> (I'm a programming Newbie, and my english isn't as well as it should be. My 
> mail should be just a 'fair comment', because I think feedback is important)
> 
> The way you  implemented the installation of Optional Methods is IMHO not as 
> good as it could be. Becaus you mixed up the renaming and the installation of 
> Methods.
> Maybe it would be better if you also implement an  explicit way to install 
> Optional Methods.

Thanks for the feedback.  Clearly I can only improve things if people voice
their opinion, so I do appreciate that.  However, I'm a little unclear of what
you're getting at, could you perhaps provide some more detail?  Do you have an
example of how you'd like to enable the installation of optional methods?

Cheers,
Mx.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl