RE: Any thoughts on the Tcl::Tk bridge?
"Jack D." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.tk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Lots snipped. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vadim Konovalov > Sent: January 6, 2005 12:35 PM > To: Rob Seegel > Cc: PerlTk List > Subject: Re: Any thoughts on the Tcl::Tk bridge? > On the other side, when using Tcl::Tk, one must be prepared > to some surprises, which are hopefully not hard to solve. What kind of surprises? (hmm - if you knew what they were, then they wouldn't be surprises) > To finalize a bit, take a look how Ruby and Python do Tk GUI. > They do it via Tcl, just like Tcl::Tk does. > My feelings is by this way you can get more in less efforts. This sounds too good to be true. Do you mean we can use *any* tcl widget but still use *only* perl? Will the polishing of this module mark the beginning of the end for perl/Tk? While tcl widgets are many and some quite unique - I'm sure that there are composite widgets being coded all the time. Will Tcl::Tk will also allow us to create composite widgets using perl? Jack -++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**== This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list server. If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message body of "unsubscribe ptk" to [email protected]