Re: question about Ptk new version
Steve Lidie <[email protected]> Sat, 8 Apr 2006 14:05:38 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.tk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Apr 8, 2006, at Apr 8, 8:21 AM, Vadim Konovalov wrote: >>>> _I_ find OO style of perl/Tk an advantage - which is why I >>>> wrote it that >>>> way. >>> >>> Tcl::Tk uses sane OO syntax, BTW >>> >> >> Syntax isn't OO. > > okay, you invented nice syntax and borrowed OO from Tix. > > Tcl/Tk has many OO systems, I view that as a drawback :) I like the fact that Perl/Tk "is OO", and that there is only one flavor to choose from, for consistency. > which I do not enlist here. > > I have no wish to buy perl/Tk OO for that a large price, and of course > other's wish may differ (unlike Python, Ruby, wsWidgets, etc, people) > > >> >> See for example recent thread here about deriving a class from >> an existing one. (Subject: Fwd: (fwd) binding to a derived canvas >> widget). > > yes, I saw that. > > Vadim. > > > -++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**== > This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list > server. If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the > message body of "unsubscribe ptk" to [email protected] -++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**== This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list server. If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message body of "unsubscribe ptk" to [email protected]