Re: question about Ptk new version

Konovalov, Vadim wrote:
>>> okay, you invented nice syntax and borrowed OO from Tix.
>>>
>>> Tcl/Tk has many OO systems,
>>>       
>> I view that as a drawback :)  I like the fact that Perl/Tk "is OO",  
>> and that there is only one flavor to choose from, for consistency.
>>     
>
> you're right, quite many people say this.
>
> Still, this drawback is not a reason to include entire GUI toolkit into Perl
> extension.
> Name other example of this approach.
>   

The problem with making statements like this, is that with something 
like Perl, it's very likely that there *are* other examples.
While it is true that the majority of GUI-related modules are bindings 
to toolkits that have bindings in other languages, Perl/Tk
is not alone in its approach. Prima is another example - it's a very 
nice, and often overlooked GUI toolkit.

> With deeply best regards,
> Vadim.
> -++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
> This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list
> server.  If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the
> message body of "unsubscribe ptk" to [email protected]
>
>
>   


-++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list
server.  If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the
message body of "unsubscribe ptk" to [email protected]