Re: Pike 8.0 RC1

Chris Angelico wrote:
>Yeah, for precisely the same ambiguity I was worrying about. But the
>more verbiage is included, the less useful it'll be. I do like the
>idea of a raw string literal - one that doesn't need all its
>backslashes escaped - but I don't expect to be nesting them more than
>three deep.

I don't think that will detract from its usefulness.  The requirement is that
the delimiter is unique, accomplishing that using delimiters that have to
adhere to a certain syntax does not limit that in any significant way.
-- 
Stephen.