Re: [scala-language] The cake’s problem, dotty des ign and the approach to modularity.
Raoul Duke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.scala |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJ7XQb4rYp-F5U_YJb+xZGimATq+MU3rMub5nXjE1a-pJK3w+A@mail.gmail.com> |
> I was trying to solve the Expression Problem cases where the control can't > be in the objects, and the control needs to be inverted and injected > orthogonal to the objects. Not to mention that my proposal is agnostic to > whether nominal or structural typing is employed. "extension methods" a la C# and many other languages rub me the wrong way. They are either: (a) proof that OO quickly sucks and we shouldn't have started with that crap in the first place! or, (b) proof that people don't effing know how to / have the intestinal fortitude to ACTUALLY DO OO for realz. either way, i hate everything. ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scala-language" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.