[scala-debate] Re: [scala-language] The cake’s pro blem, dotty design and the approach to modularity.

Please, everyone, take the discussion to scala-debate. This has
strayed too far from the topic of scala-language.

Thanks

 - Martin




On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Raoul Duke <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I was trying to solve the Expression Problem cases where the control can't
>> be in the objects, and the control needs to be inverted and injected
>> orthogonal to the objects. Not to mention that my proposal is agnostic to
>> whether nominal or structural typing is employed.
>
> "extension methods" a la C# and many other languages rub me the wrong
> way. They are either:
>
> (a) proof that OO quickly sucks and we shouldn't have started with
> that crap in the first place!
>
> or,
>
> (b) proof that people don't effing know how to / have the intestinal
> fortitude to ACTUALLY DO OO for realz.
>
> either way, i hate everything. ;-)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scala-language" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Martin Odersky
EPFL

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scala-debate" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.