Harvester status for Marcus Denker

I think Marcus has done more useful harvesting work in the last couple
of days than most of us in N weeks.

I'd say that Marcus can and should be trusted to approve stuff, except
for one thing - I haven't seen him post critical comments on any of the
code he's reviewed, and for anyone that's going to be able to get stuff
into the image where we all have to live with it, I want to know that he
can be point out where code is lacking.

Except for the selection aspect, this is also important because posting
these public comments is the way knowledge is transmitted about good/bad
practice, and not just to the author of the specific code.

What does everybody think?

Daniel
From [email protected] Sun Jun 08 19:06:19 2003
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: (qmail 12345 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2003 19:06:19 -0000
Received: from squeakland.org (65.104.119.41)
  by mail.theinternetone.net with SMTP; 8 Jun 2003 19:06:19 -0000
Received: from acm.org (Brandx-IWC.interworld.net [206.124.230.238] (may be
	forged))
	by squeakland.org (8.12.8/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h58JrEqC025238
	for <[email protected]>;
	Sun, 8 Jun 2003 12:53:15 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 12:06:44 -0700
From: Michael Rueger <[email protected]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Discussing the Squeak Foundation
	<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Squeakfoundation]Harvester status for Marcus Denker
References: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Discussing the Squeak Foundation
	<[email protected]>
List-Id: Discussing the Squeak Foundation
 <squeakfoundation.lists.squeakfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation>,
	<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeakfoundation>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation>,
	<mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 19:06:19 -0000

Daniel Vainsencher wrote:

> I'd say that Marcus can and should be trusted to approve stuff, except

Yup!

> for one thing - I haven't seen him post critical comments on any of the
> code he's reviewed, and for anyone that's going to be able to get stuff

He'll most likely do so if encouraged enough :-)

Michael