Re: Flow integration
Tim Rowledge <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.foundation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] is claimed by the authorities to have written: > Forgot one thing: > > > I'm not qualified to answer about the benefits of the new primitive > > > interfaces, I'm quite ignorant in these things. John M has (IIUC) spoken > > > in favor of it. Could we get some more input from the experts? > > I'd be interested in finding out how feasable it is to implement the flow > socket primitives in a non-threaded way. On PS/2 for example, or any *nix with > broken pthreads. The code looks like it is relying heavily on a threaded > implementation. Me too, even though Craig is convinced we can actually do threads on Acorn. I'm not so sanguine about it.... tim -- Tim Rowledge, [email protected], http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim Change is inevitable....except from vending machines.