re: Basic tenets of what goes in the image

What you say is true, but very reasonable people may wildly disagree on
what that statement means, and I'm trying to eliminate precisely that
effect... :-)

Daniel
PS -
Taking the simplifying direction a step further, my day-job team has an
expression that seems relevant - "Make Good" ;-)

Craig Latta <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > This is my proposed base policy on what should go into the image...
> 
> 	That all sounds reasonable. If we want to make policy, I think I would
> (somewhat loosely) state it as simply "the released image should contain
> things for which omission would cause confusion or inconvenience to a
> new user". Note that, as our distribution technology changes (and we get
> things like utterly-minimal images, pervasive network installation,
> unloading, etc.), the implications of that statement will evolve.
> 
> 
> -C
> 
> --
> Craig Latta
> improvisational musical informaticist
> [email protected]
> www.netjam.org/resume
> Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation