Re: re: Outstanding 3.4 bugs?
Tim Rowledge <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.foundation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]> wrote: > Suggestion - make 3.5 a very short release, consisting mainly of getting > as many fixes in as we can, and giving them a proper testing. It's an > opportunity for us Guides to warm up at doing the whole process > ourselves. I'm talking about a time scale of 1 month total - 2 weeks > alpha, 1 week beta, 1 week gamma, release. I find it just about impossible to imagine getting stuff done that quickly given the geographic and chronologic spread of people involved. It'll take more than two weeks before any decent number of people heve even downloaded 3.4, let alone done anything much to find and fix any bugs. For topics to cover + relating to the vm, how about incorporating any removal of vm/slang code that we can manage - JMM & I have been trying to get a decent release of codegen stuff together and can probably produce a removal update and re-install package. + in the image, how about the remove-b3d etc changes? + how about declaring that only fixes released by a certain date will be considered and that after that only comment improvements will be accepted ? tim -- Tim Rowledge, [email protected], http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim <-------- The information went data way -------->