Re: Smalltalk source control

Squeak has gone with a package called Monticello, written by Colin Putney and Avi Bryant (and some others).  Its pretty nice but it has its own ideas about how to version things at the method level and is not a file based approach. 

On Monday, September 18, 2006, at 02:52PM, davegriswold9 <[email protected]> wrote:

>
><<Original Attached>>


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/strongtalk/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/strongtalk/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Question for those of you who are familiar with contributing Smalltalk

source in Squeak or other open source Smalltalks:

We are going to have a problem right off the bat with source control

for the Strongtalk/Smalltalk library code. Anybody familiar with how

this is done for Squeak?

Of course we can simply archive patch file-ins, but that is inadequate

for real source control. We may need some tools in Strongtalk to help

support this, and it would be a good idea to start thinking about that

now.

-Dave