Re: Smalltalk source control

Squeakers nowadays use Monticello. It is a distributed version control 
system (like darcs), which versions Smalltalk code objects, not text 
files (like in ENVY). If someone is willing to port it to Strongtalk, it 
would make for a very good solution.

The code is quite clean and modular, and the UI is not very complex, but 
code management is not trivially separated from the particular Smalltalk.

Daniel
BTW, thanks to all that worked on this system originally, and on getting 
it released.

davegriswold9 wrote:
> Question for those of you who are familiar with contributing Smalltalk
> source in Squeak or other open source Smalltalks: 
>
> We are going to have a problem right off the bat with source control
> for  the Strongtalk/Smalltalk library code.  Anybody familiar with how
> this is done for Squeak?  
>
> Of course we can simply archive patch file-ins, but that is inadequate
> for real source control.  We may need some tools in Strongtalk to help
> support this, and it would be a good idea to start thinking about that
> now.
>
> -Dave
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/strongtalk/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/strongtalk/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/