Re: Tomcat or PHP in ST ?

The entire continuation mechanism in Seaside is about 30 lines of code. The
only VM trick it depends on is capturing thisContext and then restoring it
later.

On 5/13/07, J J <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> >From: "David Griswold" <[email protected]>
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: <[email protected]>
> >Subject: RE: Tomcat or PHP in ST ?
> >Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 14:48:58 +0200
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of azgolfer
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 7:24 PM
> > > To: Strongtalk-general
> > > Subject: Re: Tomcat or PHP in ST ?
> > >
> > > So, how hard would it be to port SeaSide to Strongtalk ? Seems like
> > > you wouldn't need the GUI. Also, what kind of scalability/
> > > multithreading does SeaSide have ?
> >
> >The issue with Seaside is that it serializes the context stack to model
> >continuations, which is definitely not what I would call trivially
> portable
> >Smalltalk.
> >
> >-Dave
>
> Can Strongtalk do this?  Or support continuations in some other way?
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i'm Initiative now.
> It's free. http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGHM_MAY07
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Strongtalk-general" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---