RE: Handing over responsibility
J J <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:17:31 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.strongtalk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It's a real shame to see you have to step back, but I understand the time concern. So, does anyone know where the Squeak port is? I think getting an existing popular system running on Strongtalk will be the fastest way to gain momentum. Just my 2 cents. > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Handing over responsibility > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:12:14 -0700 > > > Hi all, > > As I'm sure many of you have noticed, I have not been able to spend > any time in quite a while on the system. That was certainly not my > intention, but anyway that's the way things have worked out, for which > I am sorry. I keep intending to spend more time on it, but I have > decided to accept reality and get out of the way so that those of you > who have contributed can self-organize without having to wait for me > to review and integrate your contributions. > > I don't want to get too personal, but I feel like I should at least > give some explanation. Part of the problem is, as for most of you, I > have other higher priorities that I need to focus on. But besides > that, a big issue for me is that I've never gotten over the > disappointment I felt back when we had to put Strongtalk on the shelf > and work on the Java VM. I had hoped that when the system went open > source I would be able to jump back in and get motivated to work on > the system again, but for me there has just been too much "water under > the bridge" for that to happen. But those are my personal issues. As > for Strongtalk, it is still extremely cool technology, which after all > these years is still better than anything else available, and it > deserves to survive regardless of the involvement of me or others from > the original team. > > The bottom line at this point is that I probably won't be able to > spend any significant time on Strongtalk for the foreseeable future. > I do hope to contribute more at some point, but I just can't give any > commitment as to when or how much. > > So what I am doing is handing over responsibility to the other project > members with committer status. Being open source, it is up to you all > to self-organize and figure out how you want to organize things. I > would recommend that initially committers keep their changes in > repository branches until a consensus for reviewing and integrating > those changes is figured out. > > Despite this bump in the road, some excellent progress has been made. > Versions of the system have been constructed that now compile and run > using gcc, and a lot of the work to get the VM running on Linux has > been done. Those of you who want to pick up the ball and continue, > now is the time to step up, and work out between yourselves how you > want to coordinate things. > > Dave > > > > _________________________________________________________________ Peek-a-boo FREE Tricks & Treats for You! http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Strongtalk-general" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/strongtalk-general?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---