Re: .cm subdirectories
John Reppy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.sml.smlnj |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This distinction is because the bin files are more portable than the heap images (i.e., x86-unix bin files will work on Solaris, and *BSD, as well as Linux). Perhaps this level of portability isn't worth preserving, but that is the reason. - John On Feb 15, 2004, at 10:48 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > It would help if the system-dependent subdirectory of .cm was named > with the same arch-n-opsys convention as exported heaps. Right now, > my heaps are *.x86-linux but the .cm subdirectory is x86-unix. This > makes it hard to write system-independent scripts and such. > > -- > Nothing can be explained to a stone. > Or to a stoned person, either. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Smlnj-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smlnj-list > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click