Re: Re: Rails <-> BC conversion

hi jeff,

I don't share your admiration of Nitro either. It's not very well 
designed and the documentation is poor. There's a very good reason why 
the rails list gets a couple hundred messages a day ;)

best,

_alex




On Aug 1, 2005, at 4:56 AM, Jean-Christophe Michel wrote:

> Jeff Lindsay wrote:
>> Also take a look at Nitro, another big Ruby framework. It's not as
>> popular as Rails, but I believe it's designed much better. It's also
>> somewhat Rails compatible and integrates with other frameworks in
>> Ruby. It's model package, Og, is a lot better than ActiveRecord and
>> takes much better advantage of the Ruby language.
>
> Just having a look onto http://nitrohq.com/view/Og_tutorial
> I don't share your admiration. I think the great idea in ActiveRecord 
> is
> to use definition made in SQL, so no column def need to appear in class
> code.
>
> -- 
> Jean-Christophe Michel
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev-PnctHDZWAvB/Cz2I37pSEPZ4XP/[email protected]
> http://lists.binarycloud.com/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>

-- 
alex black, founder
the turing studio, inc.

510.666.0074
[email protected]
http://www.turingstudio.com

2600 10th street, suite 635
berkeley, ca 94710


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev-PnctHDZWAvB/Cz2I37pSEPZ4XP/[email protected]
http://lists.binarycloud.com/mailman/listinfo/dev