Re: Re: Rails <-> BC conversion

Jeff Lindsay wrote:
> Also take a look at Nitro, another big Ruby framework. It's not as
> popular as Rails, but I believe it's designed much better. It's also
> somewhat Rails compatible and integrates with other frameworks in
> Ruby. It's model package, Og, is a lot better than ActiveRecord and
> takes much better advantage of the Ruby language.

Just having a look onto http://nitrohq.com/view/Og_tutorial
I don't share your admiration. I think the great idea in ActiveRecord is
to use definition made in SQL, so no column def need to appear in class
code.

-- 
Jean-Christophe Michel
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev-PnctHDZWAvB/Cz2I37pSEPZ4XP/[email protected]
http://lists.binarycloud.com/mailman/listinfo/dev