Re: Proposing statsort for Boost.Sort
Jakob Lövhall via Boost <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9f9OPxC5BDb8vDdUS3ziH-tSmXS9LVHhM7ZE2r4blhakSrcu-BFVKok02PUB1cbaavNhD9iSbDO-BZtHOSt49pYgaTdhuZi2s4dMM7PhdpY=@protonmail.com> |
> Dear Boost C++ community, > > StatSort function for fast sorting is ready to be reviewed / commented on, etc. > https://github.com/drpt78/statsort > > Questions: > > Q1: Is statsort suitable for Boost C++ Library? > > Q2: What optiomization you usually use -O2 or -O3 and why? > > Q3: What is missing? > > Q4: What is wrong? > Best, > Peter tend to use O3 because its a higher number than O2, so it feels like it would be better. _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/DQGOL7EFDHAWIQ5MFBI4IF4FZS3PGPS2/