Re: Proposing statsort for Boost.Sort
Peter Taraba via Boost <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <trinity-84011ace-f5a7-4d98-b761-1ec3d06e2221-1775316938695@trinity-msg-rest-gmx-mailcom-live-575bcf45cd-s9z8b> |
It did outperform O2, so that would make sense. I am fine with O3. -- Sent with mail.com Mail app On 4/4/26, 2:57 AM "Jakob Lövhall via Boost" <[email protected] > wrote: > Dear Boost C++ community, > > StatSort function for fast sorting is ready to be reviewed / commented on, etc. > https://github.com/drpt78/statsort > > Questions: > > Q1: Is statsort suitable for Boost C++ Library? > > Q2: What optiomization you usually use -O2 or -O3 and why? > > Q3: What is missing? > > Q4: What is wrong? > Best, > Peter tend to use O3 because its a higher number than O2, so it feels like it would be better. _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/DQGOL7EFDHAWIQ5MFBI4IF4FZS3PGPS2/ _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/SDBNLMSS5CCFUHU36VGICOYPHTLNTTKQ/