Re: GitHub reliability
Peter Taraba via Boost <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <trinity-33927740-6d05-4b46-a610-1e2818f2c105-1778597604960@trinity-msg-rest-gmx-mailcom-live-6c9749f685-bbdvh> |
Whoa. That was published on: Published on: May 11, 2026 Today is May 12... That's fresh out of oven Peter -- Sent with mail.com Mail app On 5/12/26, 6:19 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost <[email protected] > wrote: On 11 May 2026 19:29, Andrey Semashev wrote: > On 11 May 2026 19:24, Vinnie Falco wrote: > >> To start, let’s catalog the possible solutions. >> >> Gitlab > > GitLab could work for me only as a self-hosted solution due to the > accessibility issues I noted earlier. That is, only if the host is > accessible. On the topic of GitLab, it isn't looking good anyway as they are cutting staff and doubling down on AI usage for development. https://about.gitlab.com/blog/gitlab-act-2/ _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/R7ZKC4AKX6MDO7OSG7AD4I6ZHOO5Y6QP/ _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/KH423QRMZMHVDAZVYQMRFPD6K4OS2U3Q/