Re: GitHub reliability
zweite Konto via Boost <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEwnnAeMYEhze3U4BfKB+yM9T0V+CPgY9a93Ukbb4+AHzGJcSg@mail.gmail.com> |
Any reason GitLab is not being considered? I think that is also a community maintained platform? On Mon, 11 May 2026, 7:50 am Klemens Morgenstern via Boost, < [email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 9:53 AM Vinnie Falco via Boost < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, May 10, 2026 at 9:07 PM Marshall Clow via Boost < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On May 10, 2026, at 5:02 PM, Peter Taraba via Boost < > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > Then they showed that they could no longer run it well > > > > > > I've used Gitea a few years ago and it looks like Codeberg's Forgejo is a > clone. > Back then Drone CI worked great with Gitea. > It seems that drone has been forked into Woodpeckers CI as well, which > Forgejo is using by default. > > Thus, the existing drone scripts should largely work. > > So either Gitea + Drone or Forgejo + Woodpeckers sound great to me. > > > > Yep. So, there is no urgency, and we should start thinking about what a > > migration plan might look like. How do we extract the open issues and > > transfer them? What do we do with the CI system? Release packages? Open > > pull requests? > > > > I think the first attempt should be to spin up a mirror of either Forgejo > and/or Gitea > and see how it works. > And then we set a date, at which we disable issues and PRs on Github > and use github as a pure (and automated) mirror. > > > > If for example we want to transfer the open issues then we should start > > collecting them now, because of rate limits (it could take weeks or > months > > to collect all the data which is not stored in the repo). > > > > Both have an "import from github" function, that allows you to import a > full project. > This is probably a good default, unless a maintainer wants to do it another > way (e.g. only transfer certains issues). > > > > > > We also might think about the libraries which are not actively maintained > > (if any?) we could reach out to authors and make sure everyone is aware > and > > involved in planning a migration. > > > > If we prepare now, we can be ready ahead of time, instead of having the > > issue forced on us when things become untenable at GitHub. > > > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > > Boost mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ > > Archived at: > > > https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/3SYG4QWSU6MV5U7WYQDJMPMIXFPZG5VD/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Boost mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ > Archived at: > https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/JQFOILZOCBSZBSFDAPKC5MXU6OJYKHBT/ > _______________________________________________ Boost mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/ Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/JSBFACOV7724MUCLGDUG5XQWKBBE3NOP/