Re: [boost][int128] Formal Review Result

Matt Borland via Boost <[email protected]> Wed, 05 Aug 2026 16:12:54 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Message-ID	<x1miRmjNy6BxTjj-SUvp5bCeYR4DlxyRci5uaEwMoh1A5pqGx4eTA19FD5UEtyVYls1xEakRsblYvvZAPfa76oSlQnNnvQOW9BOl7x3Pywk=@mattborland.com>

> Dear Boost Community,
> 

> As Review Manager for Candidate Boost.Int128, I have carefully reviewed and
> incorporated the community's feedback from July 22–31.
> 

> I decided to ACCEPT Boost.Int128 into Boost.
> 

> As for the details:
> 

> ACCEPT (7)
> Rainer Deyke (July 27) (Undisclosed)
> John Maddock (July 27) (Undisclosed)
> Christopher Kormanyos (July 27) (collaborator with the author; not C++
> Alliance)
> Pavel Pavlov (July 28) (Undisclosed)
> Peter Turcan (July 28) (C++ Alliance)
> Jamie Allsop (August 1) (Undisclosed)
> Nigel Stewart (August 1) (Undisclosed)
> 

> ACCEPT CONDITIONALLY (1)
> Guillaume Dua (July 28–30) (Undisclosed)
> 

> COMMENTS / NOT A FORMAL REVIEW
> Andrzej Krzemienski (August 2): on library-vs-builtin type semantics.
> Various Reddit reviewers (eisenwave/WG21, James20k, MarekKnapek, and
> others) contributed substantive technical feedback without a formal verdict.
> Jarod on French Discord: contributed a bug report without a formal verdict.
> 


Thank you again to everyone that participated in the review, and to Arnaud for managing it. 


Matt

_______________________________________________
Boost mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://lists.boost.org/mailman3/lists/boost.lists.boost.org/
Archived at: https://lists.boost.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/DCL52MBFOX6DG4J7DBA54SDNKUFM35L7/

publickey - [email protected] - 0xC1382EAD.asc (application/pgp-keys, 653 B)

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 343 B)