A downside of qbk

Dave Abrahams <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
I've been meaning to point out the difference between 

https://github.com/boost-lib/parameter/blob/master/doc/index.rst
https://github.com/boost-lib/spirit/blob/master/doc/introduction.qbk

As long as qbk is a full-fledged programming language, we may never be
able to expect better.  Any ideas?  Does anyone think we can possibly
convince GitHub to include a qbk processor?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.