Re: A downside of qbk
Bo Jensen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOq_XjOHotG4RBzHBwNAqOiwNUK0pEUay9Y6EBepNXMtOGwbPA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Dave Abrahams <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've been meaning to point out the difference between > > https://github.com/boost-lib/parameter/blob/master/doc/index.rst > https://github.com/boost-lib/spirit/blob/master/doc/introduction.qbk > > As long as qbk is a full-fledged programming language, we may never be > able to expect better. Any ideas? Does anyone think we can possibly > convince GitHub to include a qbk processor? Have no idea if that's possible, but damn it would be nice ! > > -- > Dave Abrahams > BoostPro Computing > http://www.boostpro.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Boost-docs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-docs >