Re: A downside of qbk
Mateusz Łoskot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABUeae-ykxfBoT1qch6C3xhu-WN+wDPYqGk4sXM73hi8M0ObpA@mail.gmail.com> |
On 6 November 2011 20:07, Bo Jensen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Dave Abrahams <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I've been meaning to point out the difference between >> >> https://github.com/boost-lib/parameter/blob/master/doc/index.rst >> https://github.com/boost-lib/spirit/blob/master/doc/introduction.qbk >> >> As long as qbk is a full-fledged programming language, we may never be >> able to expect better. Any ideas? Does anyone think we can possibly >> convince GitHub to include a qbk processor? > > Have no idea if that's possible, but damn it would be nice ! That would be great! Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org Member of ACCU, http://accu.org _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-docs