Using Quickbook for TR2 proposals?
Beman Dawes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAygHNP8g6jUo74TvdfLLZBgvzyoBqr9cr4SnisaL659FkfGNQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Presumably, several Boost developers will be working on TR2 proposals soon, and Quickbook seems like it might be an attractive way to create and maintain those proposals as they go through the committee process. In particular, I'd like to maintain a single source for reference documentation. Since I already follow the standard library's conventions for specifications, the textual differences like different namespaces should be easy to cope with using quickbook macros and conditions. Is the FAQ "Can I use QuickBook for non-Boost documentation?" entry the best place to start? http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_48_0/doc/html/quickbook/faq.html It might be helpful if we could put together an example for generating TR2 proposals. Is Quickbook a reasonable approach? Comments? --Beman