Re: [boost-docs] Query regarding boostbook and documentation

> b) DOxygen is here to stay.  I would like to see
> someone take up the challenge of making an extension
> which supports type requirements (aka concepts).
>  From the users point of view, this would look like
> the following:

I personally would not want to see Doxygen becoming a requirement, 
though I understand many like it. Personally I find it an impediment to 
writing clean, readable code.