Re: [boost-docs] Query regarding boostbook and documentation

On 1/9/16 1:53 PM, Soul Studios wrote:
>> b) DOxygen is here to stay.  I would like to see
>> someone take up the challenge of making an extension
>> which supports type requirements (aka concepts).
>>  From the users point of view, this would look like
>> the following:
>
> I personally would not want to see Doxygen becoming a requirement,

There's not danger of that happening.

> though I understand many like it. Personally I find it an impediment to
> writing clean, readable code.

As do I

But I'm accepting as a fact that many like and are going to use it.

I believe we can improve things a lot even while using it.  I'm
looking to move forward here.

Robert Ramey