Re: License
David Abrahams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes: > How should we handle the license in the shared code? In the code > that I've copied from boost.python (for instance inheritance.cpp), I have > simply kept the license note in file and added a line with my name > (where I've made enough changes to justify it..), like so: > > // Copyright David Abrahams 2002. > // Copyright Daniel Wallin 2003. > // Permission to copy, use, > // etc etc.. > > Is this acceptable practice? Should we decide upon a common license for all > boost-langbinding code? I very much like that you've adopted the new proposed Boost license, and I'm willing to start using that on all my code, so you can shift all those files to the new license as far as I'm concerned. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01