Re: License
David Abrahams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Rene Rivera <[email protected]> writes: > [2003-08-15] Daniel Wallin wrote: > >>How should we handle the license in the shared code? In the code >>that I've copied from boost.python (for instance inheritance.cpp), I have >>simply kept the license note in file and added a line with my name >>(where I've made enough changes to justify it..), like so: >> >>// Copyright David Abrahams 2002. >>// Copyright Daniel Wallin 2003. >>// Permission to copy, use, >>// etc etc.. >> >>Is this acceptable practice? > > As far as I know, yes. > >>Should we decide upon a common license for all >>boost-langbinding code? > > There's been long discusions about Boost Licensing. And there's a proposed > common license for Boost code, which I would think is the prefered one to > use from now on. But Dave knows the details about that better. > > Dave, what is the status of the license for Boost? Trying to deal with a few things Beman's uneasy about. I'm supposed to get more feedback from Lawyers tomorrow. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01