Bindings for .NET languages
Patrick Hartling <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have been trying to follow the discussions regarding the refactoring of Boost.Python and Luabind because the issue of multi-language interoperability ties in very heavily with my Ph.D. research. A lot of the discussion is way over my head right now, but I hope that with time I'll be able to garner more information from the list archives and from future posts. I have checked out the langbindings branch of the Boost source tree with the intent of learning how all the magic happens, and I am pretty sure I have a long way to go before I'll understand the code. In any event, I am curious as to how the design of the new Boost language bindings code is being generalized for languages besides Python and Lua. From some of the early discussions back in June, I got the impression that interpreted languages were the focus of the work, and I am wondering if that is in fact the case. Does that have any specific impact on the design, or does it relate more to the fact that interpreted languages often have C APIs for embedding the interpreter in natively compiled code? All of this boils down to an interest I have in making native/unmanaged C++ code (relatively?) easily accessible by C# and other .NET languages and vice versa. I really like what Boost.Python offers in terms of exposing C++ for extension and use by Python code, and I like what it offers in simplifying the Python/C API. It's something I want very much to see replicated for .NET. For the last 8 or 9 months, I have been trying to keep track of efforts to make C# talk to unmanaged C++ in roughly the same manner that Python and C++ can talk via Boost.Python. Unfortunately, the projects that held the most promise at the beginning of the year seemed to run out of steam after only a couple of months. There is SWIG's support for C#, but I am not sure that will meet my needs correctly. So, I am contemplating writing something similar to Boost.Python for .NET, though I am not yet sure how--or even if--it will work. Has anyone here given any thought to this? There are no doubt dozens of issues, big and little, that I need to investigate and evaluate before proceeding. Before I go too far, I want to be sure I don't duplicate anyone else's efforts, and I want to be sure I start from the right foundation if I do write the code myself. -Patrick -- Patrick L. Hartling | Research Assistant, VRAC [email protected] | 2624 Howe Hall: 1.515.294.4916 http://www.137.org/patrick/ | http://www.vrac.iastate.edu/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01