Re: Re: License

At 04:48 2003-08-15, David Abrahams wrote:
>Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > How should we handle the license in the shared code? In the code
> > that I've copied from boost.python (for instance inheritance.cpp), I have
> > simply kept the license note in file and added a line with my name
> > (where I've made enough changes to justify it..), like so:
> >
> > // Copyright David Abrahams 2002.
> > // Copyright Daniel Wallin 2003.
> > // Permission to copy, use,
> > // etc etc..
> >
> > Is this acceptable practice? Should we decide upon a common license for all
> > boost-langbinding code?
>
>I very much like that you've adopted the new proposed Boost license,
>and I'm willing to start using that on all my code, so you can shift
>all those files to the new license as far as I'm concerned.

Actually I haven't adopted the boost license, I'm using the MIT license
for everything I write. Can you give me a pointer to the boost license?

---
Daniel Wallin



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01