Re: License
David Abrahams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes: > At 04:48 2003-08-15, David Abrahams wrote: >>Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > How should we handle the license in the shared code? In the code >> > that I've copied from boost.python (for instance inheritance.cpp), I have >> > simply kept the license note in file and added a line with my name >> > (where I've made enough changes to justify it..), like so: >> > >> > // Copyright David Abrahams 2002. >> > // Copyright Daniel Wallin 2003. >> > // Permission to copy, use, >> > // etc etc.. >> > >> > Is this acceptable practice? Should we decide upon a common license for all >> > boost-langbinding code? >> >>I very much like that you've adopted the new proposed Boost license, >>and I'm willing to start using that on all my code, so you can shift >>all those files to the new license as far as I'm concerned. > > Actually I haven't adopted the boost license, I'm using the MIT license > for everything I write. Can you give me a pointer to the boost license? > http://boost.sourceforge.net/misc/LICENSE.txt This is still just a proposal, but I hope we'll settle on it shortly. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01