Re: Re: License
Daniel Wallin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 16:35 2003-08-15, David Abrahams wrote: >Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes: > > > At 04:48 2003-08-15, David Abrahams wrote: > >>Daniel Wallin <[email protected]> writes: > >> > >> > How should we handle the license in the shared code? In the code > >> > that I've copied from boost.python (for instance inheritance.cpp), I > have > >> > simply kept the license note in file and added a line with my name > >> > (where I've made enough changes to justify it..), like so: > >> > > >> > // Copyright David Abrahams 2002. > >> > // Copyright Daniel Wallin 2003. > >> > // Permission to copy, use, > >> > // etc etc.. > >> > > >> > Is this acceptable practice? Should we decide upon a common license > for all > >> > boost-langbinding code? > >> > >>I very much like that you've adopted the new proposed Boost license, > >>and I'm willing to start using that on all my code, so you can shift > >>all those files to the new license as far as I'm concerned. > > > > Actually I haven't adopted the boost license, I'm using the MIT license > > for everything I write. Can you give me a pointer to the boost license? > > > >http://boost.sourceforge.net/misc/LICENSE.txt > >This is still just a proposal, but I hope we'll settle on it shortly. Ok great, I'll switch to that license in all files. --- Daniel Wallin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01