Re: collaboration on boost::ruby
Rene Rivera <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Organization | Redshift Software, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tom Jordan wrote: > On 10/26/05, Rene Rivera <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Perhaps a simple binding to a C interface, think simplified >>COM, would be good to do. Ideas, and volunteers ;-), welcome. > > That has potential. > Although as Alan said XPCOM maybe better. It has been a long time since I even glanced at XPCOM so I took a quick look... Yea, ah, hm, IMO it would be simpler to implement JNI bindings than XPCOM bindings :-\ > Can I make the general claim that once a binding interface > has been made for a class heirarchy, it is expected to be able > to recompile to targets: python, lua, ruby, .... That's the hope. Reality is usually domain dependent. > Thus, the python-isapi's dll loader could have been just recompiled? > In the ideal world of course. Yea, ideally. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information