Re: collaboration on boost::ruby
Alan Gutierrez <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.langbinding |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Rene Rivera <[email protected]> [2005-10-28 20:01]: > Tom Jordan wrote: > >On 10/26/05, Rene Rivera <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>Perhaps a simple binding to a C interface, think simplified > >>COM, would be good to do. Ideas, and volunteers ;-), welcome. > > > >That has potential. > >Although as Alan said XPCOM maybe better. > > It has been a long time since I even glanced at XPCOM so I took a quick > look... Yea, ah, hm, IMO it would be simpler to implement JNI bindings > than XPCOM bindings :-\ Hmm... Wonder where I got the idea it was "simplified" COM? Maybe in comparison to ATL, or some such. Really, The Ruby binding API doesn't concern me ... http://www.whytheluckystiff.net/ruby/pickaxe/html/ext_ruby.html ... it is straight forward. I'm just taking my time and reading through MPL text. -- Alan Gutierrez - [email protected] - http://engrm.com/blogometer/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information