Re: bug on compressed_matrix ?
Thomas Klimpel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.ublas |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4468C9C2AE594745A32DC93C799A224A031FD7@DE02WEMBX2.internal.synopsys.com> |
Hoang Giang Bui wrote: > Yes, it does the trick. And I can handle the index2_data and value_data > without problem if index1_data is correct. Thank you very much. But this > confusion could be avoided if it is mentioned somewhere in the > documentation. You are right. At least the documentation of the sparse stuff seems incomplete and misleading to me. I think David Bellot started a new doxygen based ublas documentation at <ublas.sourceforge.net>. > Btw, is there any performance penalty if complete_index1_data is called? No, there is no performance penalty if "complete_index1_data()" is called before data is passed to an "external library" or your own code. Regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ ublas mailing list [email protected] http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas Sent to: [email protected]