Re: bug on compressed_matrix ?
Riccardo Rossi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.ublas |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOVdALw12HnUZ5e8t-e0TZniDNDWsmFuX+yD4ofOW7aqhtHbiA@mail.gmail.com> |
mmm is there any clean way of constructing a ublas matrix given the 3 csr vectors? riccardo On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Thomas Klimpel <[email protected] > wrote: > Hoang Giang Bui wrote: > > Yes, it does the trick. And I can handle the index2_data and value_data > > without problem if index1_data is correct. Thank you very much. But this > > confusion could be avoided if it is mentioned somewhere in the > > documentation. > > You are right. At least the documentation of the sparse stuff seems > incomplete and misleading to me. I think David Bellot started a new doxygen > based ublas documentation at <ublas.sourceforge.net>. > > > > Btw, is there any performance penalty if complete_index1_data is called? > > No, there is no performance penalty if "complete_index1_data()" is called > before data is passed to an "external library" or your own code. > > Regards, > Thomas > _______________________________________________ > ublas mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas > Sent to: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ ublas mailing list [email protected] http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas Sent to: [email protected]