Re: Scaled fixed size fonts

Uli Schlachter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.cairo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 19.01.2014 17:26, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> On 19.01.2014 12:31, Uli Schlachter wrote:
>> On 19.01.2014 02:14, James Cloos wrote:
>>>>>>>> "US" == Uli Schlachter <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>> US> Do you happen to know which packages I would have to install on
>>> US> debian testing to get different images?
>>>
>>> Look for the package containing the Adobe bdf fonts for X11.
>>
>> How exactly would I do that? What would the file name for those files be? My
>> (naiive) attempt didn't work out:
>>
>> http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=adobe&mode=path&suite=testing&arch=amd64
>>
>> (And right now the only .bdf files around belong to texlive)
>>
>>> On debian it is either xfonts-100dpi or xfonts-75dpi.
>>
>> $ LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy xfonts-75dpi
>> xfonts-75dpi:
>>   Installed: 1:1.0.3
>>   Candidate: 1:1.0.3
>>   Version table:
>>  *** 1:1.0.3 0
>>         990 http://http.debian.net/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages
>>          50 http://http.debian.net/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages
>>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>> $ LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy xfonts-100dpi
>> xfonts-100dpi:
>>   Installed: 1:1.0.3
>>   Candidate: 1:1.0.3
>>   Version table:
>>  *** 1:1.0.3 0
>>         990 http://http.debian.net/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages
>>          50 http://http.debian.net/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages
>>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>>
>> However, neither packages contain anything which I would think sounds like
>> "Adobe bdf fonts fot X11":
>>
>> http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/all/xfonts-75dpi/filelist
>> http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/all/xfonts-100dpi/filelist
> 
> These are the same fonts I've got installed, files similar to
> helvO12-ISO8859-1.pcf.gz are the ones to look out for.

Yep, I do have this from xfonts-100dpi:
/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/helvO12-ISO8859-1.pcf.gz

> If you have these
> installed "xlsfonts -fn *helvetica*" should list them as
> 
> -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-67-iso8859-1

Not really. The closest that I have are these:

$ xlsfonts -fn '*helvetica*' | grep adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal-- | grep
iso8859-1
-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-iso8859-1
-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--11-80-100-100-p-56-iso8859-1
-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--11-80-100-100-p-56-iso8859-1
-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--14-100-100-100-p-76-iso8859-1
-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--14-100-100-100-p-76-iso8859-1
-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--17-120-100-100-p-88-iso8859-1
-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--17-120-100-100-p-88-iso8859-1
-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--20-140-100-100-p-100-iso8859-1
-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--20-140-100-100-p-100-iso8859-1
-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--25-180-100-100-p-130-iso8859-1
-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--25-180-100-100-p-130-iso8859-1
-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--34-240-100-100-p-176-iso8859-1
-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--34-240-100-100-p-176-iso8859-1

> And with these in place you should be able to reproduce my images. To
> make sure I have one of them attached to this mail.

Uhm, your SVG does specify the glyphs quite differently. You have glyphs
specified as a list of rectangles (with an obvious bug that shouldn't matter
here, but that I just fixed) while in my SVG, glyphs are specified as paths. So
yeah, cairo definitely isn't using a bitmap font here.

Uli
-- 
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?
-- 
cairo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cairographics.org/mailman/listinfo/cairo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.